Roast Your Post Live: Clear Feedback, Immediate Results

How one afternoon of constructive roasting showed that your biggest blind spot sits exactly where you consider yourself the expert

Live roast of submitted posts and complete profiles
Concrete insights on content, profile and DM strategy
Attendees rewrote their profiles the same day
"The blind spot lies where you consider yourself an expert. You stop looking there, because you have already seen it."

Objective

The goal of Roast Your Post Live was to confront entrepreneurs and professionals with what their LinkedIn presence actually does — instead of what they think it does.

The focus was on:

  • Exposing blind spots in posts, profiles and positioning
  • Translating algorithm and neuromarketing knowledge into concrete choices
  • Showing the difference between being visible and being found and remembered
  • Getting attendees to make their profile work instead of merely exist
  • Sharpening the step after reach: the conversation, the DM, the relationship

On top of that, the aim was to give feedback the way it is rarely given: publicly, directly and constructively. Not to tear anyone down, but because vague feedback helps no one.

Roast your post checklist
The checklist every submitted post was measured against.

Approach

Attendees submitted one of their own LinkedIn posts in advance. Those posts were analysed live and in public by Lotte de Man and Michiel Verstraten. So many entries came in that not everything could be covered — and even that turned out to be insightful.

The fact that my submitted post was not selected to be ‘roasted’ I’ll take as a compliment 😇. I have never been given so much ‘social media value’ in such a short time.

Benno Brouwer — Managing Partner, Locum Consult · → View the post

What started as a roast of posts quickly became a roast of entire profiles.

🔥 Your profile is a museum, not a shop window

A Featured section full of old posts you are proud of sends no one anywhere. And your headline should not state your job title, but what someone gets from you.

My Featured section: old posts I thought were impressive. They send no one anywhere. My header: my job title. While it should say what someone gets from me. And the most painful one: Cialdini. I use his principles weekly at the table with boards and supervisory directors. On my own profile there was nothing of it.

Jeffrey Janssen — Interim CFO/CRO for family businesses and PE portfolio companies · → View the post

🔥 Meant as consistency, read as advertising

Company logos, fixed templates and extra information in the image: meant to create consistency, received as an ad. And ads get scrolled past.

For years I have tried to create consistency in my LinkedIn posts by neatly adding our company logo. It got roasted immediately, because the verdict was crystal clear: this simply reads as advertising. And that hits me, because I love storytelling.

Pascal van Borssum Waalkes — Chief Happiness, HappyCustomers · → View the post

🔥 Polished is the new invisible

Polished imagery loses out to a spontaneous take. For the craftsmen in the room, that was the hardest advice to accept.

As a filmmaker with over 35 years of experience I am used to getting every detail right. But simply standing in front of the camera without a script, lighting, a microphone and without a second take — for a perfectionist like me that is anything but easy. Still, I get the message.

Rolf Trijber — Event photography and videography, 35+ years of experience · → View the post

🔥 The assumptions that fell

Two stubborn beliefs were overturned in a single afternoon: emojis are in fact rewarded, and a link is no longer punished as harshly as everyone assumes.

I had sworn off all emojis. Strict. Principled. Boardroom-worthy. Turns out the algorithm actually rewards them. 🤷‍♂️

Jeffrey Janssen · → View the post

The concrete guidelines the room took home:

  • Length: around 1,200 characters for the ideal balance between depth and attention
  • Imagery: authentic photos or spontaneous video instead of polished stock
  • Fonts: avoid ‘fancy’ typefaces; the algorithm indexes your text less well
  • Keywords: repeat your focus words in your headline, About section, URL and posts
  • Emojis: functional and measured, for better scannability

Takeaways noted by Alexis van Dam, Partnership Builder & Lecturer Sales & Marketing.

🔥 Reach is not the same as conversation

The sharpest confrontation was not about content, but about what you do with the attention you get.

I am going to DM far more deliberately. Not just responding to a profile visit or a like now and then, but consciously choosing who I want to speak to, why that person, and how I turn a first contact into a real conversation. According to Michiel I am still leaving about 80% of the potential on the table. That landed 😅.

Susan van Hes — ProjectleidersAcademie · → View the post

The pattern behind every roast

An interim CFO who applies Cialdini weekly in boardrooms applied none of it to his own profile. A filmmaker with 35 years of experience knew everything about light, framing and editing — and precisely because of that, nothing about showing up authentically. A specialist in making blind spots visible in projects found a few in her own shop window.

That is exactly where the mechanism sits: where you consider yourself the expert, you stop looking.

Networking drinks after Roast Your Post Live
The drinks afterwards: where the real conversations started.

Results

The impact was not something for next quarter, but for that same evening:

  • Profiles rebuilt within hours of the session
  • Public promises to stop posting ads and start telling stories
  • A perfectionist videographer publishing his first unscripted, unedited video
  • Attendees redesigning their content calendar and DM approach
  • A wave of posts in which attendees openly shared their own roast — including what hurt
  • New connections and conversations during the networking drinks afterwards

My profile looks different tonight than it did this morning.

Jeffrey Janssen · → View the post
Group photo Roast Your Post Live
The room afterwards — roasted, but above all inspired.

What stuck most was that knowing and applying are two different things. Almost everyone in the room was already doing a lot on LinkedIn. Doing a lot, it turned out, is something else than doing it smartly and strategically.

Feedback feels uncomfortable because it touches something you are proud of. But it is exactly that one outsider with a sharp eye who sees what you have come to consider normal.

And that is precisely the difference between posting and being found.

The posts by the attendees

The best review of a roast is what people write about it afterwards. This is what the attendees shared on LinkedIn (in Dutch):

Show me the magic in real life 🪄

More cases

View all cases